You Can See Everything Review: A Documentary That Gets Inside Your Head

You Can See Everything, the riveting Nathan Fielder documentary about Elizabeth Holmes that will leave audiences talking for days.

What happens when Nathan Fielder spends 34 days with Elizabeth Holmes before she goes to prison? One of the strangest, most fascinating, and most conversation-worthy documentaries of the year.

Every once in a while, a movie comes along that practically demands a conversation the moment the credits roll. Audiences spill out of the theater, turn to one another, and immediately start trying to make sense of what they’ve just watched.

You Can See Everything, the extraordinary new documentary from Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, is exactly that kind of film.

It’s fascinating. It’s confounding. And it will challenge just about everything you think you know about its subject, disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.

At nearly three hours long, this is no casual evening at the movies. But believe me, it’s worth the commitment.

I was absolutely riveted.

Nathan Fielder Spends 34 Days Inside Elizabeth Holmes’ World

The premise alone sounds like something that could only come from Nathan Fielder.

In 2023, with Elizabeth Holmes preparing to begin her federal prison sentence following her fraud conviction, Fielder moves into the world she shares with her husband, Billy Evans.

The filmmakers begin following the couple 34 days before Holmes is scheduled to report to prison.

And what follows is unlike almost any documentary you’re likely to see.

Rather than assembling a conventional biography filled with archival footage and experts explaining what went wrong at Theranos, Fielder and Oppenheim immerse themselves in the couple’s lives.

Fielder talks to Holmes. He talks to Evans. He listens, observes, questions, and tries to understand exactly what he’s witnessing.

And as the film progresses, you find yourself doing the same thing.

Is Elizabeth Holmes being sincere? Does she believe what she’s saying? What does her husband believe? And how much of what we’re watching can we actually trust?

Those questions become the heart of the experience.

Is Any of This Real? That’s Part of the Fascination

Nathan Fielder has built a career around making audiences question the line between reality and performance.

With Nathan for You and The Rehearsal, he developed an unusual style that combines deadpan humor, elaborate situations, and an almost uncomfortable interest in human behavior.

Pair that sensibility with Lance Oppenheim’s immersive approach to documentary filmmaking, and you have a film that refuses to behave the way you expect.

You Can See Everything is experimental. It’s psychologically unsettling. It’s often bizarre.

And it’s absolutely fascinating.

The film continually challenges your assumptions, both about Holmes and about the documentary itself.

Fielder becomes something of a stand-in for the audience, asking questions that we might want answered while trying to make sense of a world in which almost every interaction raises another doubt.

Just when you think you’ve figured out what you’re watching, something happens that makes you reconsider.

It’s that kind of movie.

Elizabeth Holmes Is Heading to Prison. That’s Not the Spoiler.

Here’s something unusual about You Can See Everything. We already know where Elizabeth Holmes’ story is heading.

She was convicted of fraud in connection with Theranos, the blood-testing company she founded. She was sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison and began serving that sentence in 2023.

None of that is a surprise.

But knowing the outcome does almost nothing to prepare you for the experience of watching this documentary.

The fascination comes from the journey toward that moment, the conversations along the way, and the strange relationship that develops between Fielder and his subjects.

Whatever opinions you bring into the theater about Elizabeth Holmes, this movie is going to challenge them.

That doesn’t mean you’ll necessarily change your mind about her.

You might come away even more convinced of what you believed going in. Or you might find yourself wrestling with questions you never expected to consider.

The documentary is remarkable because it makes those questions impossible to ignore.

And I’m going to leave it there, because part of the pleasure is discovering how this increasingly unusual film unfolds.

Nearly Three Hours, and You’ll Still Be Thinking About It a Week Later

Let’s talk about the running time.

At 174 minutes, You Can See Everything is a long documentary. There’s no getting around that.

I’m not going to tell you those three hours fly by.

They don’t.

But here’s the thing. You’re so locked into what’s happening, so fascinated by these people and the increasingly strange situations, that the length becomes part of the experience.

You have time to sit with these characters. To question their behavior. To question Fielder’s behavior. And eventually, to question your own reactions.

This is a film that keeps working on you long after you leave the theater.

I’ve seen a handful of movies recently where audiences couldn’t wait to start talking the moment they walked outside.

This belongs in that group.

It’s a movie you’ll chew on for days. Maybe a week. Possibly longer.

And I’ll bet you’ll want to discuss it with anyone else who’s seen it.

A Genre-Bending Documentary That Demands Your Attention

One of the things I love about You Can See Everything is that it demonstrates just how adventurous documentary filmmaking can be.

Forget the familiar format of interviews, archival footage, and an authoritative narrator telling you what everything means.

Fielder and Oppenheim create something much harder to classify.

There are elements of psychological drama, investigative filmmaking, uncomfortable comedy, and even the feeling of a thriller.

But the real suspense comes from trying to understand the people on screen.

What are they thinking? What are they hiding? What do they believe about themselves?

And perhaps most interestingly, how much can any filmmaker truly know about the people they’re documenting?

Those are big questions. Yet the film never feels like an academic exercise.

It’s wonderfully strange entertainment that asks its audience to work a little harder.

I love that.

You Can See Everything Review: A Big Freaking Recommendation

I’m still thinking about You Can See Everything, and I suspect I will be for quite a while.

This is exactly the sort of film that reminds me why going to the movies remains such an exciting experience.

You don’t simply watch it, check it off your list, and move on.

You wrestle with it.

You question it.

You find yourself revisiting certain scenes, wondering whether you understood what you were really seeing.

Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim have made a deeply unusual documentary that challenges the expectations we bring to a true story, especially one whose ending we already know.

Is it long? Absolutely.

Is it strange? You bet.

Is it worth seeing?

A big freaking yes.

I think I’m going to watch this one again.

You Can See Everything gets my highest recommendation.

---

You Can See Everything: Film Details

• Title: You Can See Everything (2026)
• Directors: Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim
• Featuring: Elizabeth Holmes, Nathan Fielder, Billy Evans
• Genre: Documentary
• Runtime: 174 minutes
• Distributor: A24
• U.S. theatrical release: October 16, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is You Can See Everything about?

The documentary follows Nathan Fielder as he spends time with Elizabeth Holmes and her husband, Billy Evans, during the final weeks before Holmes begins serving her federal prison sentence. The film explores questions of truth, trust, and how people present themselves on camera.

Who directed You Can See Everything?

Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim co-directed the documentary.

How long is You Can See Everything?

The film runs approximately 174 minutes, or two hours and 54 minutes.

Do you need to know the Elizabeth Holmes story before watching?

Knowing the basic history of Theranos and Holmes’ fraud conviction provides useful context. However, the documentary centers on her interactions with Fielder and Evans rather than offering a conventional account of the company’s history.

Is You Can See Everything a traditional true crime documentary?

No. While it involves a convicted fraudster, the film takes an experimental approach that combines intimate interviews, unusual filmmaking techniques, and questions about reality and performance.